I assume I ought to outline what "better option" means to me; regular efficiency throughout huge temperature range, great metering through the loader, non-crucial element selection, and Finally financial system.
Never metered effectively, acquired plenty of reloads that gave pretty poor efficiency. Stopped working with it and went to Common Clays then ended up working with 20-28 powder with the most beneficial outcomes. Nonetheless Use a half made use of jug of 800x sitting all around collecting dust. Regards, Bob
Navy veteran and professional reloader Bruce Hodgdon was Operating for a salesman when he listened to which the U.S. armed forces prepared to demolish 1000s of barrels of unneeded powder soon after WWII. Even though he wasn’t sure there can be a business marketplace for the surplus powder, he took a hazard and purchased (with a bank loan towards his everyday living insurance coverage plan) fifty,000 lbs of surplus 4895 powder.
Very low stress implies it may not functionality so very well in autoloaders but Furthermore, it indicates interchanging componants mustn't get a person in force issues. I finished employing 800-X since it meters terribly but it's going to get the job done if you want it.
Some points are considered since they are demonstrably accurate, but a number of other issues are believed simply because they are asserted consistently. ~ Thomas Sowell
What while in the hell will be the manage the load information inconsistencies? Does any person seriously know? Any person which is existed 10mm reloading for even a couple of months has without doubt found or heard with regard to the now infamous 135gr Nosler load, but which is not what truly bothers me.
If you prefer 800X you have to have the guide "Pet masses" By Ken Waters. He appears to be to actually favor that powder and statements great accuracy with it. For that reason I picked up a can of 800X but I didnt like how it metered.
time, and area beneath the curve. With that, we could Truly perform some Studying. But I will be pleased if They simply update the info to true maximums.
This can be an older thread, you might not receive a response, and could be 800x reviving an aged thread. Make sure you take into account developing a new thread.
Soon after reading through these tales of woe, I'll stay with Acurate #nine. Nearly as rapidly while in the velocity Section, but goes bang everytime without problems and meters beautifully everytime.
“Enlighten the people today frequently, and tyranny and oppressions of the human body and head will vanish like evil spirits with the dawn of day.” ― Thomas Jefferson
The Honda is reassuringly Honda; with the extruded aluminium body spars, machined complete on the fork legs and single-sided swingarm, to the higher-good quality switchgear, elegant hand levers and correctly equipped bodywork.
VTEC isn’t in fact variable valve timing. Timing is fastened; exactly what the process does is change from two valves per cylinder at decreased revs to 4 valves per cylinder at bigger revs. It offers the V4 a definite powerband, and with a lot more major-conclude revs than the usual rival twin the Honda feels urgent and fascinating.
It won't seem sensible to the public. It could seem sensible, but what's the correct explanation? Why Is that this load data actually so weak across the board and why so couple of kinds of bullets and OAL's? Remember to go take a look at Western Powders load facts. That is de facto great, several unique bullets at Every grain, with a number of different OAL's. OK again to 800X. This powder won't meter quite properly, so we suggest hand loading and weighing Each and every cost for best final results. If you meter 800x it, you will probably get variance of all around .two grains or so, depending on your set up. There are plenty of powders similar to this, so its not merely this a single.